But as I see it, Apple is horrible at actually *relating* to the public. They are horrible at creating the image of a company that actually seem like, well, humans. And the most recent, though by far not the only example of this is Apple's MobileMe launch.
David Pogue in the New York Times today writes that the MobileMe launch is a mess. Essentially, for many people the email part of MobileMe doesn't work at all and is actually *eating* emails. This is bad, but the reality is that stuff happens. Software doesn't work sometimes. Worse yet, sometimes products lose data.
But the thing about Apple is they never seem to really own up to *anything*, and this tends to make things worse. There is a fine line between confidence and arrogance and Apple doesn't seem to know where it is.
This is Pogue's take on the MobileMe situation:
I called Apple. Would the P.R. team be willing to say what the problem is? What is being done to solve it? When might it be fixed? What kind of resources or time is being spent on a resolution?
No. Apple declined to comment on any of that.
A P.R. manager did, however, offer me this official statement: "The .Mac to MobileMe transition was a lot rockier than we had hoped, and we are still having some growing pains. Some users have been having problems with their e-mail in particular, and we are trying to restore the service as soon as possible. We're very thankful for our loyal customers' patience as we work out the kinks."
Shortly thereafter, that stale, static status message on the MobileMe site was expanded to include this: "We understand this is a serious issue and apologize for this service interruption. We are working hard to restore your service."
That's about as far as Apple will go in expressing an understanding of the emotional toll the outage is causing those 20,000 people.
It's amazing that Apple doesn't recognize this situation. This is an airplane that's stuck on the runway for hours with no food or working bathroom. And the pilot doesn't come on the P.A. system to tell the customers what the problem is, what's being done to fix it, how much longer they might be stuck, and how he empathizes with their plight. Instead, he comes on once every three hours to repeat the same thing: "We apologize for the inconvenience."
And indeed the situation is horrible. But the larger point is Apple seems to have a tin ear when it comes to reasonable public behavior.
One very recent example is that Apple requires that all developers who download an iPhone software development kit must digitally sign an NDA. The repercussion of this is there can be no user groups, discussion forums, consultants, or even books in the Apple iPhone eco-system because no one is allowed to talk about developing for the iPhone. How dumb. And arrogant. And heavy-handed.
Another famous example was Apple's aggressive effort to sue a writer to reveal a source about an upcoming product launch. And yet another was the horrific iPhone price cut shortly after its product launch making the initial purchasers really feel like dupes.
All these things reflect a sense that Apple just has no concern for how its actions will play with the public. When things bubble up, Apple seems to take just enough corrective action to appease the natives. It feels like they are dancing in a circle that is unreasonably small for no apparent purpose. Why dance so close to the edge of trouble. And yet, in truth, up until now it would be accurate to say they have always done just enough to keep things under control. But I keep wondering how long Apple's hyper-arrogance can continue without some fall from grace.
Indeed, the MobileMe situation can still be fixed. But the seriousness of the technical issues here combined with the typical Apple attitude really feels like a potentially serious demarcation line. And whether it is or not, I think Apple needs to work on this part of its consumer facing behavior. Because eventually this kind or hubris always gets you in trouble.

14 comments:
I totally agree. People should start voting with their wallets, as simple as that.
And you can also talk about those stains in the MacBooks, keyboard freezes when updating to Leopard, hard drives failing like mad... And although all that is important, the real problem is that they do NOT acknowledge the problem until they are *forced* to. Quite sad in my opinion.
But the fanboy-ism around Apple is just incomprehensible for me. Let's see how long it takes before you have people here *excusing* Apple with whatever reason...
To add to the list...
iMac G5 is completely unable to "sleep" in Leopard. It's my biggest regret updating it... I wish I never did. Whenever you put it to sleep it goes into some weird mode and you just end up having to hard reboot it to get it to come back to life. I don't understand how they can break something so basic that has worked for so long.
The worst part is, if you search the internet, other people have the issue and one person even posted on their forums, and it was removed from Apple. Awesome. (I'd post the url, but it comes up if you do a google search) I've yet to see a resolution. My guess is, they just want to complicate my life so I'll buy a new intel mac (but don't need since I already have one)
Even better, I ordered my iMac when it was the first gen all screen. It took a month and a half to get from order date. Once I did get it... it was cracked to hell on the frame. So I had to return it... and it took another month and a half to get the replacement. How crazy is that... I think they just treated it like a completely new order, no priority .. no nothing.. sorry bud, no computer for you (and no other, we're sorry for your inconvenience perks). Thanks.
Reminds me of a few true-isms...
"all sizzle..."
"either you're part of the solution or you're part of the problem"
Well, when David Pogue and Walt Mossberg offer up substantive criticism of Apple then you know something's really wrong b/c these gentleman rarely zing Apple. As more people switch or give Apple a try, I believe this Heisman stiff-arm will no longer suffice. If you and your fans constantly remind people that you are better, then you better be better or show a little humility when you aren't. And I write this as someone who owns two Macs.
Apple do not listen to their customers and hasn't any trace of empathy for them.
If they did, their computers would have dozens of buttons and controls.
Instead, they only do what they think is right. Which seems to work, since people buy their products.
It's particularly interesting to compare the public faces of the respective corporate cultures of Apple and Microsoft.
Microsoft has a reputation of being the big, evil, corporate machine. But MS has an incredible amount of transparency into their team's workings. Most of the teams have blogs and they have used them to share pre-release directions AND take feedback from people. For instance when Office 2007 was under development, they blogged about the Word to blog posting focusing on the HTML transformations and meeting spec. And they got some great input from people. When Vista was underway they posted videos of various teams working on pre-release parts like the Aero interface.
Conversely, Apple has a long reputation of keeping a draconian gag rule on employees about anything happening at 1 Infinite Loop. Announcements of anything are carefully crafted and controlled. They have sued their own staff, partner companies, and even enthusiast blogs to prevent anything spoiling a Steve keynote. Employees or teams blogging on their projects is almost unheard of.
I just don't understand all these concerns about the NDA and how there're no discussions about it. There certainly are:
MacRumors iPhone Programming Forum
Official Apple Developer Forum
Now that being said, it does seem like both of these are in flagrant disregard for the NDA but the fact that SDK discussions exist at a publicly-accessible official forum is compelling. Apple is well known for moderating everything in these forums, so if it wasn't alright they wouldn't exist.
There's also plenty of tutorials and even sharing of source code, but you are right that it all exists in the shadows and most people are hesitant to discuss it too much.
Much as I love my MacBook I'm not touching the iPhone in large part due to the heavy-handedness. I'm pretty nerdy, though.
Looking forward to seeing if Apple will put Doc-like apps on MobileMe.
If you don't like Apple then go Microsoft or Linux. Quit whining. If Apple email is down, use Gmail or whatever.
Pogue: "I called Apple. Would the P.R. team be willing to say what the problem is? What is being done to solve it? When might it be fixed? What kind of resources or time is being spent on a resolution?
No. Apple declined to comment on any of that."
What do you expect? Do you think there is just some simple answer?
Why don't you just let them work on it. Anything else is just trolling for hits.
I dunno folks about this "they do NOT acknowledge the problem until they are *forced* to."
One might get the impression many of you have never bought a car or a major appliance if you think Apple is anywhere near bad. Having dealt with GM, Ford and Volvo at different times in my life, or Whirlpool, Sears or Frigidaire I can say Apple can't hold a candle compared to these. Perspective people, the internet magnifies these technology issues. You step outside (Or just outside!) the internet and things become much more clear.
I suggest riding your bike for 20 miles a day, it clears your head to see what is really around you.
(Yes, I ride 20 miles as exercise each morning before work, keeps me cognizant that I date back to 'steam powered computing' and many here don't even remember Jimmy Carter in office.)
I am surprised to hear the iPhone SDK criticism. I downloaded it no problem and when I have questions I just ask on the apple developer forum. No problems so far. It did not occur to me that I am not supposed to discuss things on the apple developer forum, and even now I'm not sure that is true.
"Apple now posting near-daily MobileMe outage updates"
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/07/26/apple_now_posting_near_daily_mobileme_outage_updates.html
http://www.apple.com/mobileme/status/
Maybe they were slow to respond to this because they really are working on a DNS patch for OS X Server. Or not.
With respect to public relations, there are two ways I see of looking at this:
1) Apple is not great at public relations. They suck at public relations.
2) Apple sucks at public relations by choice. Therefore, by achieving their goal, they are actually great at public relations.
Personally, I lean toward #2. One wording of an oft-quoted adage reads: “Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by incompetence.” While some would say this describes Apples public relations efforts quite accurately, I see just the opposite. All other things being equal, I assume that most of what Apple does it does according to a plan. Of course, a few things have to fall your way, but a company does not return from the abyss the way Apple has by accident. When risk-taking in the marketplace is a matter of company policy, you cannot afford to leave a lot of other things to chance. So I truly believe that Apple has chosen to fashion a particular public image for itself, and that this image serves them well in the achievement of a particular goal or set of goals. The resulting perception that they have poor public relations skills is one which they are willing to endure.
That being said, I think we need to clarify the essential question we are tying to answer. Apple actually is great at *generating publicity* - a completely different animal from conducting public relations. Ironically, one seems to facilitate the other. By attempting to maintain this cloak of secrecy which many see as poor public relations, they generate massive publicity for their products at a minimum of expense. Incompetence, indeed!
Post a Comment