On Thursday October 2nd, I am moderating a panel on seed funding at the Early Stage Summit here in New York. I am looking forward to the event because there are going to be a lot of really interesting companies pitching, some great keynotes, and a who’s who of VCs there (and if you are a NY area VC and you’re not going you should be.)
In thinking about what to talk about I have been thinking a bunch about the state of seed funding. More specifically, I have been thinking about the incredible difficulty of going from idea to implementation for non-trivial ideas. Seed funding is difficult everywhere, but is really difficult in New York where as compared to Silicon Valley, there are fewer cashed out entrepreneurs running around who have made money in a startup and so have a pre-disposition towards early stage investing.
This problem is exacerbated by the national later stage focus of the venture community. It used to be much easier to raise money at the seed level from professional investors. Or perhaps a better way to say it might be that series A was not defined by having a finished product and customers, and so series A really could *be* seed funding. As funds have gotten bigger they are no longer interested in these small time deals because when you are managing hundreds of millions of dollars, handing out money in $250,000 chunks is perceived as inefficient.
This state of affairs troubles me because it makes the markets more incremental and less innovative – a point which I have referenced before, and which has been recently documented in ex Cisco CTO Judy Estrin’s new book Closing The Information Gap: Reigniting the Spark of Creativity in a Global Economy.
That said, I am incredibly excited about Owen Davis’s new fund NYCSeed. NYCSeed is literally for two guys in a garage. The requirements are two techies that live in New York City, and a compelling idea. The terms are fairly simple: a convertible note for $200,000 that ultimately gives them around 10% of the company. The note converts to equity when the next round closes.
This is cool stuff, and is desperately needed by the market.
Last night I spoke to Owen, who is also giving a keynote at the Early Stage Summit, about his fund and the genesis of it. Owen, a long time New York entrepreneur, said he hopes that the fund will serve as an example of the need and the opportunity associated with early stage deals, and that his template will encourage others to create similar funds.
I certainly hope this is the case. I don’t think more money needs to go into silly me too deals but I do think that spreading more of it around into the early stage space is critical to pulling tech out of its innovation malaise, so I am very much hoping NYCSeed rocks.
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

6 comments:
Nice blog, but Owen Davis wont give seed money to Tom, Dick and Harry just cuz they have a compelling idea. Connections to the person are more important that Compelling ideas in most cases and prior track record is necessary.
When VC's claim they are pioneers they are lying as they are the most risk averse people.
I am not sure if there is a case where someone had a compelling idea , no track record and no connections to the people and just presented and got funded. Now that would truly be amazing but that is just my Fantasy.
In fact, one of the core ideas behind NYCSeed is that you don't need to be "in the club" (his words not mine. His view is that the merits of the idea (and his judgement about the ability to build the thing) are all that count. So that is another thing that is indeed remarkable about his fund.
Well would surely love to be present at this Summit but it is by invitation only and get an introduction to Owen Davis.
If you have an idea, live in NY, are a techie and have a techie partner, I *strongly* suggest you submit your proposal. That said, Owen is fairly accessible, and, for example was at the last tech meetup talking to folks.
Perhaps I'm showing my naivete here, but it seems to me that even the requirement that you must be a team of 2 is a bit exclusionary too. By that criteria, Joshua Schachter of delicious fame (among others) would not have gotten funded.
What's wrong with funding the lone genius hacking in his living room? Seems to me that historically there's a lot of innovation that's come from there as well.
Hi Hank -
I love this in theory but will have trouble believing until I see people with just an idea get funded. Part of the problem, in my opinion, is that the NYCSeed fund is too small to allow for meaningful risk taking ($2MM I think). And it's taxpayer money - which likely makes it even more risk adverse. Anyway, yes - there is a huge lack of seed money in NYC, but I have found that most (if not all) investors who say "no idea is too early" are in reality looking for at least an alpha product and some users (while wishing and hoping for Sergey and Larry's next big idea -), and so are not really helping to fill in this critical funding gap.
Post a Comment