But Web 3.0 is different. Web 3.0 is about the data. In a Web 3.0 world there are no silos between applications and data objects in application “A” can be connected to or related to items in application “B”. This is really just a natural extension of the concept of the mashup. Web 3.0 is about allowing for data across applications to be organized so that it becomes useful information.
Many people will refer to the Web 3.0 as the Semantic Web. I don’t use that term because it is tied to certain specific technologies from the W3C standards organization, but the concept of Web 3.0 is much bigger than one set of technologies or specifications. In fact the W3C Semantic Web specifications do not actually cover all of the requirements for making your application data open, and so companies are appropriately inventing their own solutions. One amazingly powerful example of this is Yahoo’s new Yahoo Query Language(YQL), which, through one language, gives access to huge parts of the yahoo data universe.
Ok, so how does open access to data and new organizations for data lead to making money?
It’s simple. When you properly organize data, you can extract actionable information that leads to profitable or productive decisions. There are two types of value that can be extracted from hyper connected data: direct value and indirect value.
- Direct value is value that you get from realizing that there is a relationship between two items that your human mind would not have made. For example, imagine receiving a new email from a potential customer, and having the application be able to tell you (perhaps in a rollover) that this prospect is someone who you met at a get together last year (because it was on your calendar) and that you have several friends in common. That little bit of information might be enough to help you make that sale. In previous articles I have referred to this concept as serendipity.
- Indirect value is value that may be derived from *analyzing* the connections between objects in your data universe, typically using some kind of machine learning techniques. For example, imagine collaborative filtering, but applied not just to your book or movie purchases, but across your entire life. For an overly simple scenario, such a system might be able to suggest, based on the fact that you read a lot of books on Australia, that an airfare sale by Quantas might be of interest to you. This is only possible in a Web 3.0 world where activity stream data is accessible across all of your applications, and is not just locked into one service.
If you want to participate in this discussion, we will be talking about how to profitably leverage Web 3.0 at the Web 3.0 Conference in Santa Clara, CA October 16th and 17th.

12 comments:
This is a great post Hank! Doing away with associating Web 3.0 with Semantic Web is right on. We had been describing our business, Traackr, as a "post web 2.0" up until now to avoid the confusion with Semantic Web.
Your assessment is absolutely correct in my view: the next phase of the web will be about creating 'real' businesses that leverage Web 2.0 communities and capabilities. I'd be interested in everyone's views on how 2.0 startups (like Facebook, Twitter, Dopplr, etc.) can handle the transition.
great notes, but i'm still not convinced how someone could agree to pay smthg to get the extra-information (eg information about previous interactions with the other user) because any web service could do it.
For instance, I wouldn't pay such a service, knowing that yahoo or facebook could do it for free.
Heri,
People pay for salesforce, for Zoho, for Zimbra, for 37signals apps, and lots of other productivity apps. There have just not been enough of them adding real productivity. Neither example that I provided is something that facebook or yahoo is doing right now or is likely to do for free. Facebook, in particular, in my view adds no serious productive value. If they do begin to do so I suspect they will charge for it.
I think it is more than creating dollar value or even productivity value but more about the value of being meaningfully connected so that the whole is greater than the sum and the tools we use learn through greater interaction. the labels are less important then what the label represents. For me it is in the discovery of new and valuable connection between and among people, their ideas and potential for growth.
Great post, Hank...
I look forward to reading your post on this "upcoming" wave of the web.
keep it up!
Another excellent post! Always a pleasure to read. :)
Just one note, Qantas is spelt Qantas, not Quantas. There is no 'u' like a regular 'Q' word because the name is actually derived from an acronym.
We're hearing a lot of talk among chambers of commerce about using Web 2.0 services and engaging your members with social media. First, what is Web 2.0? Web 2.0 represents the changing of websites from providing information or e-commerce to interactive, collaborative, engaging communities. Examples include social networking sites, blogs, wikis and photo-video sharing sites where visitors participate in the content generated and the “experience”.
-----------------------------
johnyymathew
Dating
Great article thanks for the insight.
Peter
Good information it gives good insight thanks.
Get the kind of traffic that is targeted to your product. Just think, if the person who visited your website has no interest whatsoever in what you are offering, they will be among those who move on and never come back. Write articles for publication in e-zines and e-reports. This way you can locate publications that is focusing on your target customers and what you have put up might just grab their interest.
Try to write a minimum of 2 articles per week, with at least 300-600 words in length. By continuously writing and maintaining these articles you can generate as many as 100 targeted readers to your site in a day.
Always remember that only 1 out of 100 people are likely to buy your product or get your services. If you can generate as much as 1,000 targeted hits for your website in a day, that means you can made 10 sales based on the average statistic.
The tactics given above does not really sound very difficult to do, if you think about it. It just requires a little time and an action plan on your part.
Its a very nice blog.
Thanks.
nice article
Post a Comment