tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8641429817507217988.post8535669291756204652..comments2008-04-27T21:31:14.396-04:00Hank Williamsnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8641429817507217988.post-50651298029539183752008-04-27T21:31:14.396-04:002008-04-27T21:31:14.396-04:00Hank -<BR/><BR/>I would say the entrepreneur risks significantly more than the VC. An entrepreneur's reputation is far harder to repair than a bad <1% of a fund investment for the VC.Chrisnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8641429817507217988.post-68796245264160519472008-04-26T07:24:09.565-04:002008-04-26T07:24:09.565-04:00A site is the wonderful site that I looked at. Please link with me mutually. http: //161633.blogspot.com/shinoyanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03928936998028779198noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8641429817507217988.post-17235273613063776932008-04-25T11:38:36.620-04:002008-04-25T11:38:36.620-04:00Bartleby,<BR/><BR/>The assumption is that the entrepreneur must make some kind of investment before the investor has anything to invest in. Its pretty rare to go to a VC with just an idea and get money.Hank Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00592098931050346414noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8641429817507217988.post-36491320698748466352008-04-25T11:02:16.245-04:002008-04-25T11:02:16.245-04:00"the entrepreneur only risks $100,000 by not being paid for a year"<BR/><BR/>..except doesn't the VC's $1M investment cover the entrepreneur's salary for the year, whether the business takes off OR tanks?Bartlebyhttp://www.yahoo.comnoreply@blogger.com